The future of the construction industry hinges on our workforce.
Many well-respected industry sources are beginning to sound the
alarm to focus our attention on the future of workforce development.
Their message is clear: If we expect to attract and keep
good people in construction, we must improve the construction
industry’s image and we must do it quickly.
In
a recent presentation before the American Institute of Constructors,
John Tarpey, President and CEO of Centex
Construction’s Mid-Atlantic unit, had this to say about
the state of the industry and its workforce:
“As
an industry, we have done a good job at developing the knowledge
base and technical skills of our employees. We have done a poor
job at developing management skills. And we have done very little
to develop leadership skills and to address behavior.
“The
irony in this is that this really is a people business. The success
of our projects depends upon personal leadership and the ability
to develop effective relationships among team members. The success
of companies depends upon discovering what best ignites the passions
of its people.
“As
an industry, we are not going to accomplish this if we continue
to be fragmented, with a short-term transaction-based approach.
We must develop a common mission. A mission that promotes long-term
thinking based on relationships with our clients, each other,
our employees and our communities.”
The
industry’s opinion leaders recognize that our workforce
may be headed for trouble. They recognize that the solution will
require a commitment to professional standards with an integrated
approach to education, teamwork, and lifelong learning for everyone
employed in the industry.
Education
in the Construction Industry
In
recent years, the industry made education a real priority. The
state of education in the construction industry is probably the
best it’s ever been. However, the construction industry
often places a higher value on experience than it does on education.
In reality, successful construction requires both education and
experience.
Today,
our jobsites are safer than ever before. Trades people are offered
careers with attractive wages and fringe benefits. Our supervisory
and management personnel are better trained than ever. The economy
has been better than ever for longer than ever before.
So
what’s missing here? Research shows that the construction
industry’s image continues to degenerate at a point when
things seem to be better than ever. How can we attract the best
and brightest to construction when our image continues to slide?
The answer lies in higher professional standards and in recognizing
that successful construction projects require a team of professionals.
Professionalism
in Construction
When
a person receives a baccalaureate degree in engineering, that
person is called an “Engineer”. A graduate who receives
a degree in architecture is called an “Architect”.
What’s the term for a person who graduates with a baccalaureate
degree in construction? That professional is called a “Constructor”.
Since
its founding in 1971, the American Institute of Constructors (AIC)
has fostered the use of the term “Constructor” for
a construction professional. The AIC came about as an outgrowth
of the Education Committee of the Associated
General Contractors of America (AGC) when a group of visionary
AGC leaders established the AIC as the professional society for
constructors.
They
saw the need for constructors to be recognized as professionals
on the same level as architects and engineers. They understood
that, until constructors are recognized as professionals, it will
be difficult to attract significant new talent to construction.
The
AIC carefully studied the models for professional societies in
both this country and abroad. They identified the principle characteristics
for a profession, which are 1) a basic body of knowledge and peer
control 2) the service ideal of client orientation and public
trust 3) membership in a national technical society and adherence
to a code of ethics 4) a registration procedure to establish standards
by examination.
The
first project that the AIC tackled, with the support of the AGC
and the Associated
Schools of Construction (ASC), focused on the “basic
body of knowledge”. They formed the American
Council for Construction Education (ACCE), which is recognized
by the Council
for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) as the accreditation
body for college programs in construction management.
Using
AGC
curricula guidelines, ACCE began its work to standardized college
level construction programs in the mid-1970’s. Today, the
it accredits over 60 programs in construction management.
Constructor
Certification
In
1993, the AIC organized the Constructor
Certification Commission, which administers the industry’s
professional exams twice a year in over 70 universities across
the country. Just about every leading voice in the construction
industry is an active partner on the Commission, including the
AGC,
ASC,
ACCE,
the American
Subcontractors Association (ASA), Associated
Builders and Contractors (ABC), National
Association of Women in Construction (NAWIC), and others.
It is unusual for any effort in the construction industry to have
such a broad base of support.
Constructor Certification is patterned after the engineering profession’s
EIT/PE process. It begins with independent verification of an
undergraduate degree in construction or comparable experience.
A candidate who meets this requirement is eligible to sit for
the Associate
Constructor (AC) exam. With seven years additional experience
a candidate may sit for the Certified
Professional Constructor (CPC) exam.
The
first AC/CPC exams were given in 1996 and now at least 22 schools
of construction require their graduating seniors to sit for the
AC exam. This gives you an idea of how today’s graduates
are indoctrinated with the concept of professionalism.
But,
Certification isn’t only for the industry’s next generation
of constructors. Experienced constructors are also eligible to
sit for the exams and these senior constructors must lead by example.
Consider this statement by AGC President Ralph Johnson taken from
the August 2000 issue of the CONSTRUCTOR:
“John
Doe, CPC, has applied for work as a project manager at your firm.
(There is) nothing whatsoever to distinguish him from dozens of
other resumes…save for those three letters that follow his
name: “CPC”. My advice? Get him in—pronto—before
someone else snaps him up, because those letters…speak volumes.
“They
tell you that John Doe is a battle hardened industry veteran with
at least 11 years of professional experience…that he is
continuing his professional education along rigorous guidelines…and
that he meets ethical standards for professional conduct.”
Construction
Requires a Team of Professionals
Not
even the best constructor can successfully complete a complicated
construction project without other professionals on the team and
certifications are available for a variety of construction professionals
and technicians. Certification is an important emerging trend
in workforce development that will continue to grow.
Certifications
are available for constructors through the AIC
Constructor Certification Commission, support staff through
the National
Association of Women in Construction (NAWIC), for specifiers
and document technicians through the Construction
Specifications Institute (CSI), and for construction industry
business development professionals through the Society
for Marketing Professional Services. Certifications programs
exist for crane operators, interlocking paving installers, exterior
insulation installers, and the list goes on…
Recently,
the AIC
Constructor Certification Commission organized a consortium
of the construction industry’s certification authorities.
The group met in Alexandria, Virginia for the first time in April
with subsequent meetings in June, August, and November.
The
group is known at the Construction Certification Consortium (C3).
When C3 met in June, Engineering
News Record (ENR) publisher McGraw
Hill to investigate the possibility of supporting a single
web site for all the construction industry’s certification
authorities. McGraw
Hill recognizes the importance of these certification programs,
their effect on workforce development, and their ability to improve
the industry’s image.
The
importance of certification in workforce development is simple:
the professionals who pursue certification hold themselves to
a higher personal standard. They’re not afraid to put their
skills to the test, demonstrate their abilities, and hold themselves
accountable to a code of ethical conduct.
The
Crisis in Lifelong Learning
What
is it that separates our best managers, our most dynamic leaders,
from those who “just get by”? First and foremost,
it’s a commitment to lifelong learning. The best among us
are constantly improving their skills through reading, study,
and a keen interest in new knowledge.
Leading
U S industries clearly recognize the need for lifelong learning
among their management and executive ranks. But this need isn’t
generally recognized by the construction industry, as reported
by a September 2000 study by AECStrategies,
co-authored by Paul Chinowski, Ph.D. with the School
of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Georgia Institute
of Technology.
The
AECStrategies’ survey of the ENR Top 400 construction companies
showed that the construction industry is focusing “on craft
training rather than lifelong learning”. The responses showed
“the majority of (the ENR Top 400) organizations do not
incorporate the concept of lifelong learning (and) no plan of
action is in development for lifelong learning.”
This
is another indicator that the industry may place greater emphasis
on experience over education: the need for on-going education
seems to be neglected in construction. This may be why the construction
industry is looking primarily at the current shortage of craft
workers and possibly overlooking our management and executive
ranks.
Our
industry needs well-educated, experienced professionals who can
work together as a team. But experience and education won’t
be enough. The workforce of the future must be committed to lifelong
learning as well.
It’s
Time for Action
In
order to address the growing crisis in workforce development,
the industry must develop the “common mission” that
John Tarpey talked about earlier. It is paramount that the industry
makes a commitment to high professional standards. Further,
Where
Do We Go From Here?
Each
of us must make a personal commitment to the industry with an
eye toward enhancing its image. We must recognize that the future
of our industry and its workforce are in a very precarious state.
It’s time for leadership on this issue.
Are
you an industry executive, manager, or supervisor? If so, you
have a greater obligation to inspire individuals to achieve their
personal best and you must lead by example.
If
you are a constructor, do you demonstrate a commitment to professionalism
and lifelong learning? Do you and others demonstrate a commitment
to education and professional standards through certification
in your profession of specialty?
The
construction industry is well represented by trade associations,
each with a different focus representing companies from all segments
of the industry. The industry’s trade associations have
done great work toward improving the image of the construction
industry. Now, however, in a day and age when everyone asks “what’s
in it for me?”, the next trend in workforce development
must also concentrate on individuals — both personally and
professionally.
About
the author:
T.
J. Ferrantella, MBA, CPC, is principal of the Engineered
Companies, which are based in Hammond, Indiana and concentrate
on the construction of heavy/civil and railroad projects, primarily
for industry. He is also Chairman of the AIC
Constructor Certification Commission, which is based in St.
Petersburg, Florida. He can be reached via email tjferr@engineeredco.com.